From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21451 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2005 17:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 21434 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2005 17:12:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051208171215.21433.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/25304] std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00849.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #16 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-08 17:12 ------- Subject: Re: std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature "pcarlini at suse dot de" writes: | + the more general consideration that, delivering a C++0x conforming | library certainly will involve breaking the ABI in tens of different | ways I have no trouble with that. My main concern is whether the flip flop worths it *if* we're going to change back. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304