* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
@ 2005-12-08 18:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-08 18:37 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-08 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 18:32 -------
Hmm, someone else has to do decide if we only want to warn about this with
-Wunreachable-code or with just -W -Wall because 3.4.0 and above only warn with
-Wunreachable-code.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |c
Keywords| |diagnostic
Summary|Unreachable code at |[3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|beginning of switch |Unreachable code at
|statement is not reported |beginning of switch
|anymore |statement is not reported
| |anymore
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
2005-12-08 18:32 ` [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-08 18:37 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
2005-12-08 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de @ 2005-12-08 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de 2005-12-08 18:37 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of
switch statement is not reported anymore
Hello,
> Hmm, someone else has to do decide if we only want to warn about this with
> -Wunreachable-code or with just -W -Wall because 3.4.0 and above only warn with
> -Wunreachable-code.
Thank you for your quick response! It was not obvious for me that
-Wunreachable-code would enable the correct warning, since in previous
versions this warning was covered by -Wall.
It would be nice for -Wall to include -Wunreachable-code, similar to how
it was in gcc 3.3.
Best regards, Uwe
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
2005-12-08 18:32 ` [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-08 18:37 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
@ 2005-12-08 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-08 19:05 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-08 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 18:59 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> It would be nice for -Wall to include -Wunreachable-code, similar to how
> it was in gcc 3.3.
-Wunreachable-code was not in included with -Wall in 3.3 but a different
warning was enabled for this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-08 18:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-08 19:05 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
2005-12-12 3:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de @ 2005-12-08 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de 2005-12-08 19:05 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of
switch statement is not reported anymore
Hello,
> > It would be nice for -Wall to include -Wunreachable-code, similar to how
> > it was in gcc 3.3.
>
> -Wunreachable-code was not in included with -Wall in 3.3 but a different
> warning was enabled for this.
Yes, but at least there was a warning (even though a different one) when
using gcc 3.3 and -Wall. With 4.0.2 and -Wall there is no warning at all.
If I had not still been using 3.3 while migrating to 4.0.2 I would never
have found this bug in my code, because 4.0.2 did not report it with
-Wall.
Best regards, Uwe
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-08 19:05 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
@ 2005-12-12 3:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-12 6:21 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-12 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 03:01 -------
: Search converges between 2003-04-16-trunk (#231) and 2003-04-17-trunk (#232).
>From that I almost think it was orginally caused by (but I should note that the
4.0 regression would have been caused by the change over to tree-ssa):
2003-04-16 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
* c-semantics.c (find_reachable_label): New function to find a
potentially reachable label in an expression.
(expand_unreachable_if_stmt): Similar to expand_if_stmt but
assumes the start of the IF_STMT is unreachable (dead) code.
(expand_unreachable_stmt): Similar to expand_stmt but assumes
the start of the statement list is unreachable (dead) code.
(genrtl_if_stmt): If the controlling expression of the IF
is constant, use expand_unreachable_stmt for the THEN or ELSE
clause as appropriate.
(genrtl_switch_stmt): Use expand_unreachable_stmt to expand
the body of a SWITCH statement.
(expand_stmt): The code immediately following a "return",
"break", "continue" or "goto" is unreachable.
* Makefile.in (c-semantics.o): Depend upon tree-inline.h.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roger at eyesopen dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-12 3:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-12 6:21 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
2005-12-19 19:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de @ 2005-12-12 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de 2005-12-12 06:21 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of
switch statement is not reported anymore
Hello,
Another comment from my side: When using -Wunreachable-code as a means
to detect unreachable code in a switch statement I noticed that, just like
the manpage says, -Wunreachable-code issues a lot of warnings when compiling
with -g. There are so many warnings with "-g -Wunreachable-code" that it is
impossible to see which warning is justified and which is not.
The behavior with old versions of gcc was much more transparent. With gcc
3.3 I got an accurate warning for the unreachable code in the code sample I
sent you. Which gcc 4.0 I only get this warning with -Wunreachable-code,
but there are so many other (not useful) warnings that -Wunreachable-code
is not a good solution wrt the switch statement.
Best regards, Uwe
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-12 6:21 ` Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
@ 2005-12-19 19:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 3:22 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-19 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 19:21 -------
I would definitely like to see this resolved, but it will never be
release-critical: P5.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-19 19:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 3:22 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 16:06 ` [Bug c/25314] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 3:22 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-03 16:06 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 17:26 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-03 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:06 -------
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x. Adjusting milestone.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-03 16:06 ` [Bug c/25314] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-03 17:26 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-03 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-03 17:26 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 20:16 ` [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 20:16 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-11 0:11 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 20:15 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|Unreachable code at |Unreachable code at
|beginning of switch |beginning of switch
|statement is not reported |statement is not reported
|anymore |anymore
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 20:16 ` [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-11 0:11 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-11 0:37 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-11 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 00:10 -------
Created an attachment (id=16882)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16882&action=view)
proposed patch
Looking for comments in this patch...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-11 0:11 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-11 0:37 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-11 8:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-11 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-12-11 00:35:40
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-11 0:37 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-11 8:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-08 21:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-11 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 08:45 -------
You do not to warn for:
void foo (int c)
{
int a;
switch (c)
{
foo:
a = 1;
break;
case 5:
goto foo;
}
}
(any label should stop the search).
You ICE on:
void foo (int c)
{
switch (c)
{
int a;
case 5:
a = 1;
break;
}
}
plus the CASE_LABEL_EXPR (or LABEL_EXPR) can be nested in arbitrary amount of
STATEMENT_LIST/BIND_EXPRs (not sure about e.g. try blocks etc.).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-11 8:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-08 21:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 19:04 ` [Bug c/25314] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-08 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 21:40 -------
Not working on this anymore. Can't get it to produce sensible warnings...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|steven at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-08 21:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 19:04 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-17 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 19:03 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|Unreachable code at |Unreachable code at
|beginning of switch |beginning of switch
|statement is not reported |statement is not reported
|anymore |anymore
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 19:04 ` [Bug c/25314] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-17 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/25314] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
2005-12-08 18:24 [Bug c++/25314] New: Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore Uwe dot Seimet at seimet dot de
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-17 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-17 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-17 10:22 -------
-Wunreachable-code has been removed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread