From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32128 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2005 23:36:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 32116 invoked by uid 48); 8 Dec 2005 23:36:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051208233638.32115.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 23:36 ------- Hmm, I actually want to say that case 2, 4, and 6 are actually valid (But I have not looked at the standard) as anonymous types are special. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |accepts-invalid Known to fail| |2.95.3 3.0.4 3.2.3 3.4.0 | |3.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322