From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6647 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 15:09:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 6397 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 15:09:19 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051209150919.6395.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/21820] Really, really, horrible IO performance In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00937.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #18 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-12-09 15:09 ------- Subject: Re: Really, really, horrible IO performance On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:24:29AM -0000, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > On this one, we now (due to Janne's array I/O transfer) perform better > than Intel and Portland compilers (on i686-linux, ext3 filesystem). I > think this can be closed as dup of 16339. For formatted I/O performance, > we have PR 20278. IIRC, Janne's patch did not deal with IO that involves implied-do loops. I'll check this later today. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21820