* [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date
[not found] <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2024-03-26 4:22 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-21 6:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-26 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
| |il/gcc-patches/2024-March/6
| |48306.html
Keywords| |patch
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch posted that might help with this a little bit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648306.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date
[not found] <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2024-03-26 4:22 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-21 6:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-21 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-21 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> Patch posted that might help with this a little bit:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648306.html
I don't know how much of that patch overlaps with what Richi pushed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655312.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date
[not found] <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2024-03-26 4:22 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-21 6:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-21 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-23 3:26 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-21 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> > Patch posted that might help with this a little bit:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648306.html
>
> I don't know how much of that patch overlaps with what Richi pushed:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655312.html
Forgot about that, but ISTR I approved something in the end?
Anyway, reading over it the situation isn't as bad as described.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date
[not found] <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-21 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-23 3:26 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-23 14:52 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-24 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-23 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> > > Patch posted that might help with this a little bit:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648306.html
> >
> > I don't know how much of that patch overlaps with what Richi pushed:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655312.html
>
> Forgot about that, but ISTR I approved something in the end?
>
> Anyway, reading over it the situation isn't as bad as described.
So, is it ok to close this yet, or...?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date
[not found] <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-23 3:26 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-23 14:52 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-24 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-23 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #16 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Given that this issue was filed >20 years ago and both the passlist and
documentation have changed drastically since then, I think the
originally-reported bugs are probably irrelevant and it's fine to close this
issue. If there are still bugs in the internals passlist docs it would be more
helpful to have specific issues for each of them (e.g., missing/incorrect docs
for a particular pass or group of passes). Or, just propose a patch to improve
the docs. :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date
[not found] <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-23 14:52 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-24 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-24 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There's definitely passes missing and the initial section of how the
compilation flows until the pass manager takes over needs work. I'd say we
keep this as a general bug that the passes section needs TLC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread