public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
[not found] <bug-23769-11321@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-12-10 5:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 6:23 ` ash at onezero dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-10 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 05:27 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Yes, I'm running the most recent one of those. The discussion in the cygwin
> lists does not make it appear that it is easy to compile and install gcc.
That is not true but what ever.
No feedback in 3 months so closing as invalid.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
[not found] <bug-23769-11321@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-10 5:27 ` [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-10 6:23 ` ash at onezero dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ash at onezero dot org @ 2005-12-10 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from ash at onezero dot org 2005-12-10 06:23 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Yes, I'm running the most recent one of those. The discussion in the cygwin
> > lists does not make it appear that it is easy to compile and install gcc.
> That is not true but what ever.
> No feedback in 3 months so closing as invalid.
What is not true but what ever?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
2005-09-07 19:11 [Bug c/23769] New: " ash at onezero dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-10 2:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-10 2:33 ` ash at onezero dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ash at onezero dot org @ 2005-09-10 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ash at onezero dot org 2005-09-10 02:33 -------
Yes, I'm running the most recent one of those. The discussion in the cygwin
lists does not make it appear that it is easy to compile and install gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
2005-09-07 19:11 [Bug c/23769] New: " ash at onezero dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
@ 2005-09-10 2:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-10 2:33 ` ash at onezero dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-10 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-10 02:22 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm on Cywin and couldn't find a later version of gcc - is there one somewhere
> that I can use?
Either you can compile one or I think cygwin has a couple of versions of GCC you can install.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
2005-09-07 19:11 [Bug c/23769] New: " ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-07 19:14 ` [Bug middle-end/23769] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
@ 2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-10 2:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-10 2:33 ` ash at onezero dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ash at onezero dot org @ 2005-09-07 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ash at onezero dot org 2005-09-07 19:18 -------
(Cygwin)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
2005-09-07 19:11 [Bug c/23769] New: " ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-07 19:14 ` [Bug middle-end/23769] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ash at onezero dot org @ 2005-09-07 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ash at onezero dot org 2005-09-07 19:18 -------
I'm on Cywin and couldn't find a later version of gcc - is there one somewhere
that I can use?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code
2005-09-07 19:11 [Bug c/23769] New: " ash at onezero dot org
@ 2005-09-07 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-07 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-07 19:14 -------
3.3.x is old and does not have the inlining improvements that went into 3.4.x. You might want to try
3.4.x or even 4.0.x. 4.1.x (the mainline) has better inlining still.
But without a full testcase, we won't know if this is fixed. I am thinking it is for 4.0.x or 4.1.x.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23769
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-10 6:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-23769-11321@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-10 5:27 ` [Bug middle-end/23769] always inline short functions if inlining would be as small as non-inlined code pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 6:23 ` ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-07 19:11 [Bug c/23769] New: " ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-07 19:14 ` [Bug middle-end/23769] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-07 19:18 ` ash at onezero dot org
2005-09-10 2:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-10 2:33 ` ash at onezero dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).