From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1355 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2005 19:25:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1267 invoked by uid 48); 14 Dec 2005 19:25:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051214192500.1266.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug pch/14940] PCH largefile test fails on various platforms In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "brett dot albertson at stratech dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg01491.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #33 from brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2005-12-14 19:24 ------- I think I'm seeing this same problem on Solaris x86. Executing on host: /var/tmp/gcc_svn/gcc20051214/gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/gcc_svn/gcc2 0051214/gcc/ largefile.c -O0 -g -I. -S -o largefile.s (timeout = 300) largefile.c:1: fatal error: had to relocate PCH^M compilation terminated.^M compiler exited with status 1 output is: largefile.c:1: fatal error: had to relocate PCH^M compilation terminated.^M FAIL: largefile.c -O0 -g (test for excess errors) Excess errors: largefile.c:1: fatal error: had to relocate PCH Should the SPARC fix apply for x86 also? Brett Albertson -- brett dot albertson at stratech dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brett dot albertson at | |stratech dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940