From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8736 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2005 00:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 8723 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2005 00:50:50 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051220005050.8722.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/25305] [4.0 regression]: libfortran failed fma3d in SPEC CPU 2K In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg02053.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 00:50 ------- My apologies, I was looking at the wrong place. Grigory, thanks for test case. I have regression tested the patch and see no new failures. There are some NIST failures, but these are not affected by the patch. We have already fixed those failures in 4.1 and 4.2. I will commit the patch tonight as "obvious" Again, sorry for the confusion. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-12-20 00:50:48 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25305