From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11943 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2005 22:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11915 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2005 22:35:55 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051227223555.11914.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/25125] [4.1 Regression] (short) ((int)(unsigned short) + (int)) is done in the wrong type In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg02681.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #21 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-27 22:35 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] (short) ((int)(unsigned short) + (int)) is done in the wrong type > However, I'm getting different tree code with the x86 cross. I can't reproduce this problem. Maybe I forgot to remove the last build after updating and cc1 didn't get rebuilt, or somehow svn messed up and I didn't get the change to convert.c. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25125