From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30030 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2006 00:02:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 29961 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2006 00:02:14 -0000 Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060104000214.29956.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/25632] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with const int copied into two different functions In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #11 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-04 00:02 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with const int copied into two different functions rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz wrote: > what about this patch, then (assuming it passes testing)? Better -- but there's no reason to do it before the break statement; if we're not going to use init, then we don't neeed to unshare it. I think you can do it right *after* the break statement. > Index: cp/init.c > =================================================================== > *** cp/init.c (revision 109271) > --- cp/init.c (working copy) > *************** constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool integr > *** 1503,1508 **** > --- 1503,1510 ---- > mark_used (decl); > init = DECL_INITIAL (decl); > } > + init = unshare_expr (init); > + > if (!(init || init == error_mark_node) > || !TREE_TYPE (init) > || (integral_p > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25632