From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28589 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2006 20:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 28518 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jan 2006 20:30:43 -0000 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060107203043.28515.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "malitzke at metronets dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2006-01-07 20:30 ------- Not all of the underlying are just g77 features. Some like 18540/25705 are legal f90, f95, f06 code an just calling them "excremental" is unprofessional. This diminishes the 90% plus of dedicated people working on GCC. If something is clearly impoosible to continue as part of fortran then an effort to change the specs should be made. -- malitzke at metronets dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |malitzke at metronets dot | |com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292