public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108024330.23378.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-19292-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #15 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-01-08 02:43 -------
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:30:51AM -0000, Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de wrote:
>
> I find this very offensive. As you will have noticed we have a problem report
> about this, which is not closed as "WONTFIX", and thus we're definitely not
> just calling this feature "excremental". Also, you're saying that Paul Thomas
> (who wrote the original bug report where this wording is used) is
> unprofessional and undedicated. The latter is easily disproved by taking a
> look at the ChangeLog. In fact, everybody working on gfortran is doing so
> out of dedication, as noone of us is getting paid for this work, and everybody
> has access to commercial compilers.</rant>
>
> This construct in non-standard for the reasons quoted by Steve and and so far
> the people working on gfortran have considered the importance of this bug
> second to the other bugs they were fixing. If somebody cares enough he may
> bring forth a patch, which -- provided sufficient quality -- will be
> integrated, and we will be one step closer to a complete Fortran 66 compiler.
>
Wow. You took the words out of my mouth. It took me nearly
40 minutes to write my last reply. Self editing of some rather
pointed comments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-19292-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-12 23:29 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-07 20:30 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2006-01-07 21:55 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-07 22:17 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 0:33 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2006-01-08 0:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-08 1:58 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 2:30 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2006-01-08 2:43 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu [this message]
2006-01-08 10:41 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2006-01-08 13:18 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-08 16:37 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 20:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-27 19:24 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-05-27 20:24 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2006-05-27 20:28 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-07-03 12:14 ` franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
2006-07-03 12:58 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-03 16:41 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-03 17:17 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-07-26 12:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-02 9:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-17 18:21 ` pertusus at free dot fr
2006-12-18 21:39 ` pertusus at free dot fr
2007-08-14 23:22 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-16 12:10 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 14:39 [Bug fortran/19292] New: [metabug] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-22 22:33 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-23 0:25 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-23 22:38 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 15:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 12:59 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-20 22:21 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-22 13:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 14:32 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-11 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-13 19:10 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-13 19:29 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 20:17 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-16 0:19 ` fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-16 14:32 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-17 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-22 22:17 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-22 23:19 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-25 7:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-25 13:37 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-26 17:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-03 8:10 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-06 9:54 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-08 11:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-20 1:10 ` milan at cmm dot ki dot si
2005-04-20 1:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:14 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:15 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-24 14:01 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 7:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:47 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:50 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:52 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-05 23:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-11 11:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-15 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-31 17:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-16 22:29 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-16 23:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-17 16:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-01 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-07 9:56 ` fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-09 12:14 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 4:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 4:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 4:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-14 15:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-16 20:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-19 8:48 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-19 21:45 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-06 13:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 12:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-08 18:51 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-12 11:07 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 8:57 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-18 19:53 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108024330.23378.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).