public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108131846.11411.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-19292-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #17 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 13:18 -------
Instead of continuing a pointless flame war in a PR which is only
organisationally related to the bug we're talking about, let me explain a few
procedural details which will hopefully make you understand that noone called
your colleague's code names.
You submitted a bug which was closed as a duplicate of an existing bug. In the
existing bug, the submitter (who by that time wasn't yet a developer of
gfortran) dismissed as "excremental" an artificial example which demonstrates a
bad coding practice that has not been allowed by any Fortran standard since
1978. Somehow you form the opinion that Paul insulted your colleague, and
question Paul's motivations and skills. (WRT Let me just say that Paul has
fixed 105 PRs during the last year alone -- obviously he thought they were more
important than this bug which he reported.)
I understand your frustration that this bug hasn't yet been closed, and I'm
grateful that you're using gfortran and reporting bugs, but I think that
everybody's time could be better spent than by arguing about who insulted who
and how the standard should be quoted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-19292-8513@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-12 23:29 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-07 20:30 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2006-01-07 21:55 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-07 22:17 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 0:33 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2006-01-08 0:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-08 1:58 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 2:30 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2006-01-08 2:43 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 10:41 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2006-01-08 13:18 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-01-08 16:37 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-08 20:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-27 19:24 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-05-27 20:24 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2006-05-27 20:28 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-07-03 12:14 ` franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
2006-07-03 12:58 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-03 16:41 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-03 17:17 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-07-26 12:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-02 9:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-17 18:21 ` pertusus at free dot fr
2006-12-18 21:39 ` pertusus at free dot fr
2007-08-14 23:22 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-16 12:10 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 14:39 [Bug fortran/19292] New: [metabug] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-22 22:33 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-23 0:25 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-23 22:38 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 15:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 12:59 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-20 22:21 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-22 13:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 14:32 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-11 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-13 19:10 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-13 19:29 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 20:17 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-16 0:19 ` fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-16 14:32 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-17 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-22 22:17 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-22 23:19 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-25 7:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-25 13:37 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-26 17:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-03 8:10 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-06 9:54 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-08 11:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-20 1:10 ` milan at cmm dot ki dot si
2005-04-20 1:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:11 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:14 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:15 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-23 16:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-24 14:01 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 7:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:47 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:50 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:52 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-05 23:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-11 11:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-15 3:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-31 17:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-16 22:29 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-16 23:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-17 16:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-01 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-07 9:56 ` fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-09 12:14 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 4:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 4:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 4:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-14 15:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-16 20:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-19 8:48 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-19 21:45 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-06 13:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 12:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-08 18:51 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-12 11:07 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 8:57 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-18 19:53 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108131846.11411.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).