public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/23451] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060110234106.4173.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-23451-5724@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #16 from herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au 2006-01-10 23:41 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:36:51PM -0000, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> So, closing as INVALID, i.e. not-a-bug. It's an interesting oddity though.
> I've learned something again today :-)
I still think this is an optimisation issue though since it should know
not to reload something that's already in a register.
Cheers,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23451
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-10 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-23451-5724@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-31 5:05 ` [Bug target/23451] [3.4/4.0/4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/23451] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 20:57 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 21:27 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 21:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 22:44 ` herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au
2006-01-10 22:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:01 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:04 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:25 ` herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au
2006-01-10 23:36 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:41 ` herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au [this message]
2006-01-10 23:44 ` [Bug target/23451] Redundant reloading from stack frame on i386 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-10 23:45 ` herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au
2006-01-29 18:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-22 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060110234106.4173.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).