From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4189 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2006 23:41:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 4174 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2006 23:41:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060110234106.4173.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/23451] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg01020.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #16 from herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au 2006-01-10 23:41 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:36:51PM -0000, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > So, closing as INVALID, i.e. not-a-bug. It's an interesting oddity though. > I've learned something again today :-) I still think this is an optimisation issue though since it should know not to reload something that's already in a register. Cheers, -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23451