From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9893 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2006 03:15:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 9876 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2006 03:15:42 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 03:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060115031542.9875.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/10050] ifcvt is not smart enough In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg01405.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 03:15 ------- This might have been fixed by (I am going to check soon) : 2006-01-14 Ian Lance Taylor * ifcvt.c (noce_init_if_info): New static function, broken out of noce_process_if_block. (noce_process_if_block): Call noce_init_if_info. (check_cond_move_block): New static function. (cond_move_process_if_block): New static function. (process_if_block): Call cond_move_process_if_block. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050