From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30459 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2006 23:15:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30434 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2006 23:15:33 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060115231533.30433.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] rejects "i"(&var + 1) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg01476.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 23:15 ------- This is valid code, but not particularly commonplace code. Furthermore, it doesn't look like we've got any good way to fix this -- except for the patch in Comment #8. What were the results of the testing mentioned in Comment #9? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200