* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-22 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (36 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-22 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22 21:51 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (35 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22 21:51 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (34 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-11-03 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-03 08:47 -------
Started passing on x86-linux but still failing on x86_64 as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Nov 2 22:35:36 UTC 2005 (revision 106403)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (33 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-11-14 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-14 07:47 -------
Patch pending.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra
|dot org |dot nyu dot edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-18 3:44 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (32 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-14 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 07:49 -------
> Patch pending.
No, there is no possible patch. They *have* to be compiled with -fstack-check.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|dot nyu dot edu |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-18 3:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-23 17:21 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (31 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-18 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 03:44 -------
*** Bug 25839 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-18 3:44 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-23 17:21 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-23 17:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (30 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-23 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 17:21 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:21:18 2006
New Revision: 110131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110131
Log:
PR ada/20548
* ada/acats/norun.lst: Add c52103x, c52104x and c52104y.
* ada/acats/stackcheck.lst: New file, add c52103x, c52104x and c52104y.
* ada/acats/run_all.sh: Pass -fstack-check for tests in stackcheck.lst.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/stackcheck.lst
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/norun.lst
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_all.sh
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-23 17:21 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-23 17:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-23 17:59 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (29 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-23 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 17:22 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:22:40 2006
New Revision: 110132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110132
Log:
PR ada/20548
* ada/acats/norun.lst: Add c52103x, c52104x and c52104y.
* ada/acats/stackcheck.lst: New file, add c52103x, c52104x and c52104y.
* ada/acats/run_all.sh: Pass -fstack-check for tests in stackcheck.lst.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/stackcheck.lst
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/norun.lst
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_all.sh
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-23 17:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-23 17:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 20:49 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (28 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-23 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 17:59 -------
Until after they are removed from the norun.lst file.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Summary|[4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS |[4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS
|c52103x c52104x c52104y |c52103x c52104x c52104y
|segfault at runtime on |segfault at runtime
|x86_64 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-23 17:59 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28 20:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 20:53 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS |[4.2 Regression] ACATS
|c52103x c52104x c52104y |c52103x c52104x c52104y
|segfault at runtime |segfault at runtime
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-28 20:49 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28 20:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 22:15 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-28 20:53 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28 22:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-19 9:00 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (25 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-28 22:15 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.2 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-19 9:00 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-29 23:14 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.2/4.3 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-19 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 09:00 -------
Patch in the works.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|
|org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-08-29 13:38:50 |2006-03-19 09:00:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.2/4.3 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-19 9:00 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-29 23:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-28 11:18 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-29 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-29 23:14 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.2/4.3 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-28 11:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-20 13:10 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (22 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-28 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|patches/2006- |patches/2006-
|03/msg01239.html |11/msg01846.html
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-28 11:18 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-20 13:10 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2007-02-20 13:11 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2007-02-20 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-02-20 13:10 -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> Patch in the works.
>
any progress?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-20 13:10 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2007-02-20 13:11 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-05 18:57 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-20 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 13:11 -------
> any progress?
See the 'Patch URL' field.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-20 13:11 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-05 18:57 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-05 19:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-05 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #26 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-05 18:57 -------
Eric,
what is the status for this PR? Is there some work to do on your patch? Or is
the issue moot?
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet| |botcazou@adacore.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-05 18:57 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-05 19:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-15 0:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-05 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #27 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-05 19:02 -------
> what is the status for this PR? Is there some work to do on your patch?
Commit it after approval. :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-05 19:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-15 0:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-06 14:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-15 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #28 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 00:39 -------
Update milestone after 4.3.0 release.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.0 |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-15 0:44 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-06-06 14:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:50 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-06-06 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-06 14:56 -------
4.3.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.1 |4.3.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-06 14:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 19:50 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-27 22:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #30 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:49 -------
Mark properly as regression again.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|ACATS c52103x c52104x |[4.3/4.4 Regression] ACATS
|c52104y segfault |c52103x c52104x c52104y
| |segfault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 19:50 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-27 22:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:20 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-27 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #32 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:01 -------
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.2 |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-27 22:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-24 10:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-03 14:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-24 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #33 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:19 -------
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-24 10:20 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4 regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-03 14:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-06-04 12:58 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-02-03 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #34 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 14:02 -------
Is this still a 4.4 regression?
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bonzini at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-03 14:02 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-04 12:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-04 13:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-04 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #35 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 12:58 -------
This bug is marked as one of the "GCC 4.5 pending patches" PRs. Why? I see no
pending patch...?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2009-06-04 12:58 ` [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-06-04 13:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-04 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #36 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 13:24 -------
> This bug is marked as one of the "GCC 4.5 pending patches" PRs. Why? I see no
> pending patch...?
They are at AdaCore for the time being. Will need to submit them...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2009-06-04 13:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-03 21:23 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #37 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-03 21:23 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-03 22:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-03 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-19 09:00:55 |2009-11-03 21:23:42
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-03 21:23 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-03 22:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-04 21:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-03 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #38 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-03 22:49 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 3 22:49:37 2009
New Revision: 153877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153877
Log:
PR target/10127
PR ada/20548
* expr.h (STACK_CHECK_PROBE_INTERVAL): Delete.
(STACK_CHECK_PROBE_INTERVAL_EXP): New macro.
(STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP): Likewise.
* system.h (STACK_CHECK_PROBE_INTERVAL): Poison it.
* doc/tm.texi (Stack Checking): Delete STACK_CHECK_PROBE_INTERVAL.
Document STACK_CHECK_PROBE_INTERVAL_EXP and STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP.
* doc/md.texi (Standard Pattern Names): Tweak entry of CHECK_STACK.
Document PROBE_STACK.
* explow.c (anti_adjust_stack_and_probe): New function.
(allocate_dynamic_stack_space): Do not directly allocate space if
STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP, instead invoke above function.
(emit_stack_probe): Handle probe_stack insn.
(PROBE_INTERVAL): New macro.
(STACK_GROW_OPTAB): Likewise.
(STACK_GROW_OFF): Likewise.
(probe_stack_range): Use Pmode and memory_address consistently. Fix
loop condition in the small constant case. Rewrite in the general
case to be immune to wraparounds. Make sure the address of probes
is valid. Try to use [base + disp] addressing mode if possible.
* ira.c (setup_eliminable_regset): Set frame_pointer_needed if stack
checking is enabled and STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP.
* rtlanal.c (may_trap_p_1) <MEM>: If stack checking is enabled,
return 1 for volatile references to the stack pointer.
* tree.c (build_common_builtin_nodes): Do not set ECF_NOTHROW on
__builtin_alloca if stack checking is enabled.
* unwind-dw2.c (uw_identify_context): Take into account whether the
context is that of a signal frame or not.
* config/i386/linux.h (STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP): Define to 1.
* config/i386/linux64.h (STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP): Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/linux.h
trunk/gcc/config/i386/linux64.h
trunk/gcc/doc/md.texi
trunk/gcc/doc/tm.texi
trunk/gcc/explow.c
trunk/gcc/expr.h
trunk/gcc/ira.c
trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c
trunk/gcc/system.h
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree.c
trunk/gcc/unwind-dw2.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-03 22:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-04 21:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-04 21:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-04 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #39 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 21:46 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Nov 4 21:45:54 2009
New Revision: 153918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153918
Log:
PR target/10127
PR ada/20548
* config/i386/i386.md (probe_stack_range): New expander.
(logical operation peepholes): Do not split stack checking probes.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/norun.lst
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_acats
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-04 21:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-04 21:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-07 9:46 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-04 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #40 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 21:49 -------
Tentatively on mainline.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-04 21:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-07 9:46 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2009-11-07 10:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org @ 2009-11-07 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #41 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2009-11-07 09:45 -------
As I understand it, there is still a patch pending for i386?
Does anyone plan to backport this patch into gcc-4_4-branch?
I am considering applying this patch (up to r153918) in Debian's
gnat-4.4. Before I do that, I'd like to know whether this would break
ABI compatibility. Consider the following scenario:
gnat-4.4 uploaded without the patch (this is the present situation)
libfoo.so.1 built with -fstack-check
gnat-4.4 updated with the patch (hypothetical situation)
libbar.so.1 built with -fstack-check, links against libfoo.so.1
frobnicate built with -fstack-check, links against libfoo.so.1
shazaam built with -fstack-check, links against libbar.so.1
Will stack checking work in libbar.so.1, frobnicate and shazaam?
Is it necessary to rebuild libfoo.so.1?
Is it necessary to rebuild anything depending on libfoo.so.1?
Thanks for all the hard work!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-07 9:46 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
@ 2009-11-07 10:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-10 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-07 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #42 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-07 10:05 -------
> As I understand it, there is still a patch pending for i386?
Yes, the current stack checking method is not bullet-proof and can fail to
detect stack overflows; a warning should be issued in that case though. The
enhanced method indeed requires another patch for the x86 back-end, that I plan
to resubmit for 4.5 once I've fixed the optimization bug exhibited by a few
ACATS tests.
> Does anyone plan to backport this patch into gcc-4_4-branch?
No, no plan to backport this as far as I'm concerned. Note that some support
code is needed in the Ada runtime (init.c, see the comments).
> I am considering applying this patch (up to r153918) in Debian's
> gnat-4.4. Before I do that, I'd like to know whether this would break
> ABI compatibility. Consider the following scenario:
-fstack-check is broken with GCC 4.4 on x86/x86-64 Linux, it generates code
that will easily segfault so I doubt compatibility really matters. In any
case, -fstack-check doesn't change the ABI.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-07 10:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-10 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-10 12:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-10 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #43 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-10 11:24 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 10 11:23:54 2009
New Revision: 154061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154061
Log:
PR ada/20548
* explow.c (probe_stack_range): Fix typo.
* config/sparc/sparc.md (probe_stack): New expander.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md
trunk/gcc/explow.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-10 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-10 12:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-10 20:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-25 19:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-10 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #44 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-10 12:38 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 10 12:37:56 2009
New Revision: 154063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154063
Log:
PR ada/20548
* system-linux-alpha.ads (Stack_Check_Probes): Set to true.
* system-linux-hppa.ads (Stack_Check_Probes): Likewise.
* system-linux-sparc.ads (Stack_Check_Probes): Likewise.
* system-linux-sparcv9.ads (Stack_Check_Probes): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ada/system-linux-alpha.ads
trunk/gcc/ada/system-linux-hppa.ads
trunk/gcc/ada/system-linux-sparc.ads
trunk/gcc/ada/system-linux-sparcv9.ads
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-10 12:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-10 20:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-25 19:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-10 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #45 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-10 20:45 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 10 20:45:25 2009
New Revision: 154079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154079
Log:
PR target/10127
PR ada/20548
* expr.h (anti_adjust_stack_and_probe): Declare.
* explow.c (anti_adjust_stack_and_probe): Make global, add ADJUST_BACK
parameter and rewrite head comment.
(allocate_dynamic_stack_space): Adjust call to above function.
* function.c (expand_function_end): Handle STACK_CHECK_MOVING_SP.
* tree.h (dwarf2out_args_size): Delete.
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_args_size): Make static and move around.
(dwarf2out_args_size_adjust): Delete prototype and move around.
(dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr): Do not record arg size adjustments for
ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS targets.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c
trunk/gcc/explow.c
trunk/gcc/expr.h
trunk/gcc/function.c
trunk/gcc/tree.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-10 20:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-11-25 19:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
37 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-25 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #46 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 19:55 -------
Subject: Bug 20548
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Nov 25 19:55:11 2009
New Revision: 154650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154650
Log:
PR target/10127
PR ada/20548
PR middle-end/42004
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_args_size_adjust): Rename to...
(dwarf2out_stack_adjust): ...this. Do not adjust the arg size for
ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS targets. Rename former version to...
(dwarf2out_notice_stack_adjust): ...this. Adjust for above renaming.
(dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr): Revert previous change and adjust for
above renaming.
(dwarf2out_frame_debug): Add ??? comment. Adjust for above renaming.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread