From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15134 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2006 19:50:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 15112 invoked by uid 48); 19 Jan 2006 19:50:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060119195047.15111.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] rejects "i"(&var + 1) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amacleod at redhat dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg01989.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #16 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-01-19 19:50 ------- Created an attachment (id=10678) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10678&action=view) updated patch I updated the patch to the current mainline, and have built and verified no additional failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu. I suspect it is safe, but I am also doing a full bootstrap now. -- amacleod at redhat dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #9523 is|0 |1 obsolete| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200