public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hjl at lucon dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/25899] ACATS FAIL c34006a cc1226b on x86-linux with -mtune=k8 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:04:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20060123170402.26428.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-25899-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #13 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 17:04 ------- Jan, I have verified that turn on x86_partial_reg_stall: const int x86_partial_reg_stall = m_PPRO; fixes those 2 failures. That is why only -mtune=pentiumpro passes those 2 tests. Does it ring any bells to you? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25899
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 17:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-01-21 9:37 [Bug ada/25899] New: [4.2 Regression] ACATS FAIL c34006a cc1226b on x86-linux laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-21 20:59 ` [Bug ada/25899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 23:11 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-21 23:33 ` [Bug target/25899] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-22 14:51 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-22 16:08 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-22 16:14 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-22 16:50 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-23 5:32 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 5:34 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 6:03 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 14:37 ` [Bug target/25899] ACATS FAIL c34006a cc1226b on x86-linux with -mtune=k8 hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 15:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 15:27 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:13 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 17:04 ` hjl at lucon dot org [this message] 2006-01-23 17:44 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-01-24 12:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-24 13:28 ` [Bug target/25899] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 7:05 ` [Bug target/25899] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c34006a cc1226b failure on x86 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 7:37 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/25899] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 8:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 13:43 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-01-25 13:52 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 14:57 ` hjl at lucon dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20060123170402.26428.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).