From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3984 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2006 11:30:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3968 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2006 11:30:21 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060202113021.3967.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sven dot buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from sven dot buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund dot de 2006-02-02 11:30 ------- I tested the patch and encountered another internal compiler error. The problem, however, is that this new error so far only occurs with a code consisting of several thousand code lines and disappears as soon as I try to remove some complexity. Nevertheless, I'm trying to deduce a reasonably sized test case. I recon the error message I get does not help you to much in the meantime: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have omp_clause in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans- types.c:1458 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26064