From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26088 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2006 21:56:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 25750 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2006 21:56:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060203215611.25748.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jason at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 21:56 ------- Subject: Bug 25977 Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 3 21:56:03 2006 New Revision: 110564 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110564 Log: PR c++/25979 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Disable *& optimization for now. PR middle-end/25977 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): It's not always safe to do RVO on the return slot if it's an NRV. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv10.C branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv11.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/gimplify.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/temp1.C -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25977