From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24233 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2006 16:19:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 24215 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2006 16:19:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060206161909.24214.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/25553] Missed removal of load In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 16:19 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > We should be able to create a PHI for this case. > > Hmm, maybe I don't understand load PRE but for some reason I thought it would > be able to do this case: This load PRE issue has been fixed. But the orginal testcase is not been fixed because it is a seperate optimization. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25553