From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25043 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2006 10:07:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 25023 invoked by uid 48); 7 Feb 2006 10:07:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060207100736.25022.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/26140] [4.2 Regression] ice on valid C++ code In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00624.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 10:07 ------- Ho humm, so I propose to revert the patch (that I didn't like very much anyway). Can I do so without approval? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26140