From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-175950-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 748 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2006 18:56:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 718 invoked by uid 48); 7 Feb 2006 18:55:57 -0000
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060207185557.717.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-26134-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug middle-end/26134] fold *(float*)(&complex_float_var) into REALPART_EXPR<complex_float_var>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26134-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "falk at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00696.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #6 from falk at debian dot org  2006-02-07 18:55 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > I see here another missed optimization on x86-64.
> > 
> > float re(float _Complex a) { return __real__ a; }
> 
> That is a totally different issue and should filed as a different bug.

Probably related to PR 7061.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26134