From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3065 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2006 12:43:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 3045 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2006 12:43:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060208124351.3044.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26169] [4.2 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00759.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 12:43 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I didn't trip over anything like this on my x86 testing, but I have > been able to reproduce it with a cross compiler. The fix is > pretty trivial, but it'll take until sometime tomorrow before the > regression testing and such is complete. I should mention why you did not trip over it on the x86 testing orginally. This: if (p == 0) if (do_create) Was orginally: if (p == 0 && do_create) Which causes a slightly different IR. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-02-08 12:43:51 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26169