public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault
@ 2006-01-30 22:35 hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/26038] " hjl at lucon dot org
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-30 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006]$ cat foo.f90
subroutine foo(self)
character(*) :: self
pointer :: self
allocate(self)
end subroutine
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006]$ /usr/gcc-4.2/bin/gcc -S foo.f90 -m32
foo.f90: In function foo:
foo.f90:4: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006]$ /usr/gcc-4.2/bin/gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.0 20060119 (experimental) [trunk revision 109972 clean]
--
Summary: FORTRAN segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-30 22:39 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 23:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-30 22:39 -------
It happens on gcc 4.2, 4.1 and 4.0. But gcc-4.1-redhat is fine:
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006]$ /usr/gcc-4.1-redhat/bin/gcc -S foo.f90 -O2
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006]$ /usr/gcc-4.1-redhat/bin/gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 20060128 (Red Hat 4.1.0-0.17) [redhat/gcc-4_1-branch revision
110368 clean]
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/26038] " hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-30 23:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-30 23:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-30 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 23:48 -------
This code is meaning less as far as I can tell but it is accepted by Lahey's
compilers.
Oh don't try redhat's branch please it is not something that is just wrong to
do with a modifed compiler at least in bug reports.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/26038] " hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 23:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-30 23:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 0:45 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-30 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 23:59 -------
If I change the program to use a constant size string, it works.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |19276
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-30 23:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-31 0:45 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 0:59 ` Andrew Pinski
2006-01-31 1:15 ` Andrew Pinski
2006-01-31 0:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-31 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 00:45 -------
This code is extracted from a much larger program. Intel FORTRAN compiler
has no problem with it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-31 0:45 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-31 0:59 ` Andrew Pinski
2006-01-31 1:15 ` Andrew Pinski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2006-01-31 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 00:45 -------
> This code is extracted from a much larger program. Intel FORTRAN compiler
> has no problem with it.
And what should it allocate a zero sized string?
-- Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 0:45 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-31 0:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2006-01-31 1:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2006-01-31 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 00:59 -------
Subject: Re: FORTRAN segfault
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 00:45 -------
> This code is extracted from a much larger program. Intel FORTRAN compiler
> has no problem with it.
And what should it allocate a zero sized string?
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 0:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2006-01-31 1:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2006-01-31 1:52 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2006-01-31 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 01:15 -------
Subject: Re: FORTRAN segfault
On Jan 30, 2006, at 7:45 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> Intel FORTRAN compiler has no problem with it.
Intel's Fortran compiler does not detect a lot of
invalid code, that does not make this code valid.
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-31 0:45 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 0:59 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2006-01-31 1:15 ` Andrew Pinski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2006-01-31 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs
On Jan 30, 2006, at 7:45 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> Intel FORTRAN compiler has no problem with it.
Intel's Fortran compiler does not detect a lot of
invalid code, that does not make this code valid.
-- Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 1:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2006-01-31 1:52 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 11:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-31 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 01:52 -------
The original code looks like
subroutine foo(self)
character(*) :: self
pointer :: self
nullify(self)
allocate(self)
self = " "
end subroutine
Is this code valid? How can I make it valid?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] FORTRAN segfault
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 1:52 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-31 11:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 12:58 ` [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-31 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 11:12 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> The original code looks like
>
> subroutine foo(self)
> character(*) :: self
> pointer :: self
> nullify(self)
> allocate(self)
> self = " "
> end subroutine
>
> Is this code valid? How can I make it valid?
I think it's valid.
(The length of 'self', which is needed at allocation, should be passed to foo
by the caller. For example, the code below should print
5
10
on execution:
-----------
module moo
contains
subroutine foo(self)
character(*) :: self
pointer :: self
nullify(self)
allocate(self)
print *, len(self)
end subroutine
end module moo
program hum
use moo
character(5), pointer :: p
character(10), pointer :: q
call foo(p)
call foo(q)
end program hum
-----------------
)
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-01-31 11:12:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy.
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 11:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-31 12:58 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2006-01-31 15:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr @ 2006-01-31 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2321 bytes --]
------- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-01-31 12:58 -------
If you look at the code produced by this final example, the 2nd argument of
_gfc_allocate is null. This comes about because the TYPE_SIZE_UNIT that Jakub
hated me setting directly is a NULL_TREE. I suspect that his patch will fix
this. Otherwise, this works and will be submitted tonight:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c (révision 110394)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c (copie de travail)
@@ -3254,8 +3254,12 @@
val = gfc_create_var (ppvoid_type_node, "ptr");
tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (ppvoid_type_node, se.expr);
gfc_add_modify_expr (&se.pre, val, tmp);
-
- tmp = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (se.expr)));
+
+ tmp = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (se.expr)));
+
+ if (expr->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && tmp == NULL_TREE)
+ tmp = se.string_length;
+
parm = gfc_chainon_list (NULL_TREE, val);
parm = gfc_chainon_list (parm, tmp);
parm = gfc_chainon_list (parm, pstat);
This results in the hidden charlen dummy argument being passed to the library
allocate.
Hah! I just undid the above and applied Jakub's patch; as I suspected it fixes
the bug and produces the following code:
foo (self, _self)
{
bit_size_type D.802;
<unnamed type> D.803;
D.802 = (bit_size_type) (<unnamed type>) _self * 8;
D.803 = (<unnamed type>) _self;
*self = 0B;
{
void * * ptr.0;
ptr.0 = (void * *) self;
_gfortran_allocate (ptr.0, (<unnamed type>) _self, 0);
}
{
struct __st_parameter_dt dt_parm.1;
dt_parm.1.common.filename = "pr26038.f90";
dt_parm.1.common.line = 10;
dt_parm.1.common.unit = 6;
dt_parm.1.common.flags = 128;
_gfortran_st_write (&dt_parm.1);
{
int4 D.801;
D.801 = _self;
_gfortran_transfer_integer (&dt_parm.1, &D.801, 4);
}
_gfortran_st_write_done (&dt_parm.1);
}
}
MAIN__ ()
{
char[1:10] * q;
char[1:5] * p;
foo (&p, 5);
foo (&q, 10);
}
I will email Jakub to let him know. Perhaps the trick will be to apply his
pre-gomp patch to 4.2 and mine to 4.1?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy.
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 12:58 ` [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
@ 2006-01-31 15:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-09 23:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-31 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 15:21 -------
I can't verify if the whole program compiles correctly due to PR 26041.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy.
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 15:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-02-09 23:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-13 19:32 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-09 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 23:23 -------
Subject: Bug 26038
Author: pault
Date: Thu Feb 9 23:23:28 2006
New Revision: 110816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110816
Log:
2006-02-09 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26038
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_allocate): Provide assumed character length
scalar with missing backend_decl for the hidden dummy charlen.
PR fortran/25059
* interface.c (gfc_extend_assign): Remove detection of non-PURE
subroutine in assignment interface, with gfc_error, and put it in
* resolve.c (resolve_code).
PR fortran/25070
* interface.c (gfc_procedure_use): Flag rank checking for non-
elemental, contained or interface procedures in call to
(compare_actual_formal), where ranks are checked for assumed
shape arrays..
2006-02-09 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26038
* gfortran.dg/allocate_char_star_scalar_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25059
* gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25070
* gfortran.dg/assumed_shape_ranks_1.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_char_star_scalar_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_shape_ranks_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy.
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-09 23:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-13 19:32 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-13 19:35 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 19:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-13 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 19:32 -------
Subject: Bug 26038
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 13 19:32:02 2006
New Revision: 110921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110921
Log:
2006-02-13 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26038
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_allocate): Provide assumed character length
scalar with missing backend_decl for the hidden dummy charlen.
PR fortran/25059
* interface.c (gfc_extend_assign): Remove detection of non-PURE
subroutine in assignment interface, with gfc_error, and put it in
* resolve.c (resolve_code).
PR fortran/25070
* interface.c (gfc_procedure_use): Flag rank checking for non-
elemental, contained or interface procedures in call to
(compare_actual_formal), where ranks are checked for assumed
shape arrays..
2006-02-13 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26038
* gfortran.dg/allocate_char_star_scalar_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25059
* gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25070
* gfortran.dg/assumed_shape_ranks_1.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_char_star_scalar_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_shape_ranks_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy.
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-13 19:32 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-13 19:35 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 19:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-13 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 19:35 -------
fixed on trunk and 4.1.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy.
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-13 19:35 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 19:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-11 19:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-30 22:35 [Bug fortran/26038] New: FORTRAN segfault hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/26038] " hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-30 23:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-30 23:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 0:45 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 0:59 ` Andrew Pinski
2006-01-31 1:15 ` Andrew Pinski
2006-01-31 0:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2006-01-31 1:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2006-01-31 1:52 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 11:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 12:58 ` [Bug fortran/26038] ICE on allocation of assumed length CHARACTER dummy paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2006-01-31 15:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-09 23:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-13 19:32 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-13 19:35 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 19:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).