public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
@ 2006-02-09 18:52 kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-09 19:12 ` [Bug fortran/26201] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-09 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I have been contacted about compiling MUMPS.
http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/MUMPS/MUMPS_4.6.tar.gz
For some reason, gfortran 4.1.0 writes out __convert_i4_i8
as a function within a module. The question is why?
gfc -O2 -Wfatal-errors -I../libseq -Dpord -I. -I../include -c dmumps_ooc.F
gfc -O2 -Wfatal-errors -I../libseq -Dpord -I. -I../include -c dmumps_part1.F
gfc -O2 -Wfatal-errors -I../libseq -Dpord -I. -I../include -c dmumps_part2.F
In file dmumps_part2.F:962
END SUBROUTINE DMUMPS_80
1
Error: Name '__convert_i4_i8' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to
'__convert_i4_i8' from module 'dmumps_ooc'
troutmask:sgk[209] grep -2 convert src/dmumps_ooc.mod
()
(2 '__convert_i4_i8' 'dmumps_ooc' 1 ((PROCEDURE UNKNOWN-INTENT
UNKNOWN-PROC UNKNOWN INTRINSIC FUNCTION ELEMENTAL PURE) (INTEGER 8 ()) 0
0 () () 0 () ())
--
('max_ooc_file_size' 0 329 'dmumps_609' 0 282 'dmumps_579' 0 216
'db_do_io_and_change_hbuf' 0 55 'buf_io' 0 17 '__convert_i4_i8' 0 2
'current_pos' 0 16 'cur_pos_sequence' 0 4 'cur_hbuf' 0 3
'db_copy_factor_to_buffer' 0 6 'current_solve_read_zone' 0 5
--
Summary: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to
a module.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-09 19:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-12 21:25 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-09 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 19:12 -------
Possibly related to the patch for PR 25716 (committed to mainline 2005-01-25).
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-09 19:12 ` [Bug fortran/26201] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-12 21:25 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-13 2:53 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jb at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-12 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-12 21:25 -------
FWIW, this same bug (or a very similar one) blocks compiling VASP too:
In file cl_shift.f90:1377
END MODULE
1
Error: Name '__convert_r4_r8' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to
'__convert_r4_r8' from module 'constant'
well, it's r4_r8 and not i4_i8 but otherwise it seems to be the same..
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-09 19:12 ` [Bug fortran/26201] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-12 21:25 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-13 2:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 21:20 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-13 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Priority|P3 |P5
Summary|[4.1/4/2 regression, |[4.1/4.2 regression,
|fortran] __convert_i4_i8 |fortran] __convert_i4_i8
|written to a module. |written to a module.
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-13 2:53 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-15 21:20 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 21:30 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-15 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 21:20 -------
I can't reproduce the problem with MUMPS on Linux/x86 (mainline revision
111111, 4.1 revision 110989). Assuming that Steve used a 64 bit processor, it
seems that for this code the bug is visible only on 64 bit systems. (The fact
that problem occurs for the function __convert_i4_i8 also indicates that, since
conversions from 4 byte to 8 byte integers happens more often on 64 bit systems
than on 32 bit ones.)
The VASP code I do not have available, so I can't test that one. (Since it is
about reals rather than integers, it's not unlikely that that would be
reproducable on 32 bit systems.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-15 21:20 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-15 21:30 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-02-16 12:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu @ 2006-02-15 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-02-15 21:30 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:20:15PM -0000, eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
> I can't reproduce the problem with MUMPS on Linux/x86 (mainline revision
> 111111, 4.1 revision 110989). Assuming that Steve used a 64 bit processor, it
> seems that for this code the bug is visible only on 64 bit systems. (The fact
> that problem occurs for the function __convert_i4_i8 also indicates that, since
> conversions from 4 byte to 8 byte integers happens more often on 64 bit systems
> than on 32 bit ones.)
>
> The VASP code I do not have available, so I can't test that one. (Since it is
> about reals rather than integers, it's not unlikely that that would be
> reproducable on 32 bit systems.)
>
I see the problem on amd64-*-freebsd. For the record,
gfc4x -O2 -Wfatal-errors -v -I../libseq -Dpord -I. -I../include -c
dmumps_part2.F
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0
Configured with: ../gcc4x/configure --prefix=/mnt1/sgk/work/4x
--enable-languages=c,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060215 (experimental)
/mnt1/sgk/work/4x/libexec/gcc/amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0/4.2.0/cc1 -E
-lang-fortran -traditional-cpp -D_LANGUAGE_FORTRAN -quiet -v -I../libseq -I.
-I../include -Dpord dmumps_part2.F -mtune=generic -Wfatal-errors -O2 -o
/mnt1/sgk/tmp/cc6Lln73.f
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/mnt1/sgk/work/4x/lib/gcc/amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0/4.2.0/../../../../amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
../libseq
.
../include
/usr/local/include
/mnt1/sgk/work/4x/include
/mnt1/sgk/work/4x/lib/gcc/amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0/4.2.0/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
/mnt1/sgk/work/4x/libexec/gcc/amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0/4.2.0/f951
/mnt1/sgk/tmp/cc6Lln73.f -ffixed-form -quiet -dumpbase dmumps_part2.F
-mtune=generic -auxbase dmumps_part2 -O2 -Wfatal-errors -version -I../libseq
-I. -I../include -fpreprocessed -I
/mnt1/sgk/work/4x/lib/gcc/amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0/4.2.0/finclude -o
/mnt1/sgk/tmp/ccSOkFPo.s
GNU F95 version 4.2.0 20060215 (experimental) (amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.0 20060215 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
In file dmumps_part2.F:962
END SUBROUTINE DMUMPS_80
1
Error: Name '__convert_i4_i8' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to
'__convert_i4_i8' from module 'dmumps_ooc'
In file dmumps_part2.F:962
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-15 21:30 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
@ 2006-02-16 12:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-16 14:08 ` P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-16 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-02-16 12:25:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-16 12:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-16 14:08 ` P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
2006-02-16 14:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de @ 2006-02-16 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-02-16 14:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=10862)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10862&action=view)
Sources which exhibit this behaviour (under 32-bit linux)
Hi!
Here's something that exhibits this behaviour... If I may say so, I find it
*really* weird: removing things which do not seem to be related to that seem to
make it disappear though...
I hope this helps, good luck!
Philippe
PS: do not look for any meaning in these sources: I tried to remove as much as
I could from the original sources (...)
PPS: the way I do it:
.../Gcc/bin/gfortran -c Sources.f90
In file Sources.f90:84
END SUBROUTINE toolModifyAnzKorn
1
Error: Name '__convert_i4_r4' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to
'__convert_i4_r4' from module 'module_randbed'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-16 14:08 ` P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
@ 2006-02-16 14:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 19:52 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-16 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 14:12 -------
With Philippe's testcase, I can reproduce the problem on my system now.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-16 14:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-18 19:52 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 23:54 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-18 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 19:52 -------
Here's a small one-liner patch that I think fixes the bug. I'll post it to the
mailing list later tonight if/when it passes regression testing.
Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (revision 111236)
+++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (working copy)
@@ -3428,6 +3428,7 @@ gfc_convert_type_warn (gfc_expr * expr,
new->symtree->n.sym->attr.elemental = 1;
new->symtree->n.sym->attr.pure = 1;
new->symtree->n.sym->attr.referenced = 1;
+ gfc_intrinsic_symbol(new->symtree->n.sym);
gfc_commit_symbol (new->symtree->n.sym);
*expr = *new;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-18 19:52 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-18 23:54 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-02-19 17:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu @ 2006-02-18 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-02-18 23:54 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:52:27PM -0000, eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (revision 111236)
> +++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (working copy)
> @@ -3428,6 +3428,7 @@ gfc_convert_type_warn (gfc_expr * expr,
> new->symtree->n.sym->attr.elemental = 1;
> new->symtree->n.sym->attr.pure = 1;
> new->symtree->n.sym->attr.referenced = 1;
> + gfc_intrinsic_symbol(new->symtree->n.sym);
> gfc_commit_symbol (new->symtree->n.sym);
>
> *expr = *new;
>
This fixes the problem of compiling MUMPS on amd64-*-freebsd.
OK to commit to trunk. You'll need approval from markm to
commit to 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-18 23:54 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
@ 2006-02-19 17:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 18:34 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 " jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-19 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 17:23 -------
Subject: Bug 26201
Author: eedelman
Date: Sun Feb 19 17:23:07 2006
New Revision: 111270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111270
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-19 Erik Edelmann <eedelman@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26201
* intrinsic.c (gfc_convert_type_warn): Call
gfc_intrinsic_symbol() on the newly created symbol.
testsuite/
2006-02-19 Erik Edelmann <eedelman@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26201
* gfortran.dg/convert_1.f90: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/convert_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-19 17:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-20 18:34 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 18:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jb at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-20 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 18:34 -------
With this fix, trunk is now once again able to compile VASP. Too bad it seems
to be a bit late to get into 4.1. Maybe 4.1.1?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-20 18:34 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 " jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-20 18:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 18:51 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-20 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 18:36 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> With this fix, trunk is now once again able to compile VASP. Too bad it seems
> to be a bit late to get into 4.1. Maybe 4.1.1?
Actually it looks like it was approved for 4.1 (after RC1 was out which it is
already):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01574.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-20 18:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-20 18:51 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 20:06 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 23:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-20 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 18:50 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > With this fix, trunk is now once again able to compile VASP. Too bad it seems
> > to be a bit late to get into 4.1. Maybe 4.1.1?
> Actually it looks like it was approved for 4.1 (after RC1 was out which it is
> already):
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01574.html
Yep. The patch was small and simple enough that I dared to ask RM Mark M if it
was OK. And he said yes, so I intend to commit it to 4.1 later tonight.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-20 18:51 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-20 20:06 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 23:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-20 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 20:06 -------
Subject: Bug 26201
Author: eedelman
Date: Mon Feb 20 20:06:49 2006
New Revision: 111311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111311
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-20 Erik Edelmann <eedelman@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26201
* intrinsic.c (gfc_convert_type_warn): Call
gfc_intrinsic_symbol() on the newly created symbol.
testsuite/
2006-02-20 Erik Edelmann <eedelman@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26201
* gfortran.dg/convert_1.f90: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/convert_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-20 20:06 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-20 23:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-20 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 23:37 -------
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-20 23:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-09 18:52 [Bug fortran/26201] New: [4.1/4/2 regression, fortran] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-09 19:12 ` [Bug fortran/26201] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-12 21:25 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-13 2:53 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 21:20 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1/4.2 regression] " eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-15 21:30 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-02-16 12:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-16 14:08 ` P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
2006-02-16 14:12 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 19:52 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 23:54 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-02-19 17:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 18:34 ` [Bug fortran/26201] [4.1 " jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 18:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 18:51 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 20:06 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-20 23:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).