From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29907 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 00:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29899 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 00:35:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060216003554.29898.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/26147] another memory leak In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "uttamp at us dot ibm dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg01764.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-02-16 00:35 ------- Subject: Re: another memory leak > > ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 23:09 ------- > Fixed. > > dist_v and init_v are GC pointers so they don't really need to be freed > manually. That's correct. I realized it after submitting the bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26147