From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16496 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 02:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 16479 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2006 02:51:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060216025115.16478.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg01782.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 02:51 ------- Still have the address of labels failure on 4.0, 4.1 and mainline: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00383.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00431.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00508.html 4.0 has some additional errors that I believe can be fixed by backporting the fix for PR16045. -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org Last reconfirmed|2006-01-29 17:51:11 |2006-02-16 02:51:15 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623