From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11214 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2006 13:59:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 11195 invoked by uid 48); 21 Feb 2006 13:59:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060221135915.11194.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg02397.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 13:59 ------- 4.0 results are now on par with 4.1, meaning AFAICS we only have the address of labels problem to worry about on all 4.* branches. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00986.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623