From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26051 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2006 16:30:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26013 invoked by uid 48); 22 Feb 2006 16:30:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060222163011.26012.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/25603] [4.1 Regression]: Miscompiled FORTRAN program In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg02536.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 16:30 ------- As this is a wrong-code regression for 4.1 (albeit on ia64-linux), Mark should re-consider the priority and maybe allow this patch in. And the patch submitter should have asked for that in the first place (and can now ask for it please). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25603