From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16928 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2006 17:12:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 16914 invoked by uid 48); 22 Feb 2006 17:11:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060222171159.16913.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/26424] tr1/unordered vs 64-bit machines In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "falk at debian dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg02544.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #1 from falk at debian dot org 2006-02-22 17:11 ------- Just curious: is the assumption of prime-size buckets hardwired in the TR? Otherwise, the obvious alternative would be to use power-of-two sizes, which are much faster in access. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26424