From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31753 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2006 18:22:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 31724 invoked by uid 48); 24 Feb 2006 18:22:41 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060224182241.31723.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg02838.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 18:22 ------- Actually never mind I see the issue now but I still say this is a latent bug and not really my bug. And the patch is wrong anyways in general as most of those places really should have been testing something like var_can_have_subvars instead of AGGREGATE_TYPE_P anyways. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |normal Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26439