From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30179 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2006 19:14:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30149 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2006 19:14:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060224191453.30148.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/26459] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg02858.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-02-24 19:14 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets edmar at freescale dot com wrote: > I started a build. This is a very slow target, it will take several hours... If you've got a fast workstation somewhere, you can set it up as a cross-compiler; should take about five minutes to build a cross compiler. But, there's not going to be a release today, so a few hours is not a big deal. I would like to fix this by changing only a known-broken header file, if possible, because that is a known-safe fix. That would allow us to support this target without risking any other platforms, where testing has been performed all along. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459