From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16014 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2006 21:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 15983 invoked by uid 48); 24 Feb 2006 21:15:13 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060224211513.15982.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/26459] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "edmar at freescale dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg02877.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #9 from edmar at freescale dot com 2006-02-24 21:15 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on > powerpc e500-double targets > > > > Bummer. > > Please attach preprocessed source and configuration options so that we > have a shot at reproducing. > > However, I'm afraid that means you're going to be out of luck in GCC > 4.1.0; hopefully the problem will be fixed before 4.1.1! > > I'd consider a patch for 4.1.0, but only if it's available very > shortly, and is obviously safe from the perspective of other targets; I > do not intend to do an RC3, so we cannot put other targets at risk. > > Sorry, > Mark, On comment #7 I did attach floatformat.i, also the ICE output was done with -v. The config options are visible there. Do you need more info ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459