From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27377 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2006 21:42:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 27355 invoked by uid 48); 27 Feb 2006 21:42:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060227214206.27354.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/26459] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc fails to build on powerpc e500-double targets In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg03096.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-27 21:42 ------- Re. comment #3, testing all releases is, I'm sorry to say, rather worthless. Things usually break during development, not during the release process. Obviously nobody can tell you what to do with your resources, but it shouldn't be very hard for a company like FreeScale to set up an automatic testing system and test the trunk more regularly, instead of testing it days before a release and filing 11th hour bug reports. The fact that Mark would accept a patch for GCC 4.1.0 for this problem really surprises me. I'd use the opportunity and try to fix the problem asap ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459