From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27250 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 03:30:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 27214 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2006 03:30:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060228033036.27213.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "roger at eyesopen dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg03144.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #12 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-02-28 03:30 ------- Hi moof, the way that you can test this patch is to run "make -k check" from the top-level after bootstrapping the tree. You'll notice that even before my change (with RC1 for example), there'll be several thousand libstdc++ and libgfortran failures. With the newly proposed patch, you should now see only a handful of failures for these testsuites. I hope this helps. -- roger at eyesopen dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489