public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/26489]  New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
@ 2006-02-27 23:01 dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-27 23:09 ` [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (19 more replies)
  0 siblings, 20 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-02-27 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

With a freshly svn up'ed gcc to the 4.1.0 branch, and an empty obj dir, I get
the following compile error on NetBSD-current (3.99.15).

/aux/obj/gcc41/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/aux/obj/gcc41/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/a
ux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/aux/obj/gcc41/i38
6-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/usr/local//i386-unknown-net
bsdelf3.99.15/bin/ -B/usr/local//i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local//i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/include -isystem
/usr/local//i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/sys-include
-I/aux/src/gcc41/libstdc++-v3/../gcc
-I/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15
-I/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/aux/src/gcc41/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates -Wall
-Wextra -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -fdiagnostics-show-location=once
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -c
/aux/src/gcc41/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc  -fPIC -DPIC -o eh_alloc.o
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_once(__gthread_once_t*, void (*)())':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:515:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_once' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_key_create(__gthread_key_t*, void (*)(void*))':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:523:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_key_create' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_key_delete(__gthread_key_t)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:529:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_key_delete' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'void* __gthread_getspecific(__gthread_key_t)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:535:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_getspecific' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_setspecific(__gthread_key_t, const void*)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:541:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_setspecific' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_mutex_lock(__gthread_mutex_t*)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-n
etbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:548: error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutex_lock'
was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_mutex_trylock(__gthread_mutex_t*)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:557:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutex_trylock' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int __gthread_mutex_unlock(__gthread_mutex_t*)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:566:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutex_unlock' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:
In function 'int
__gthread_recursive_mutex_init_function(__gthread_recursive_mutex_t*)':
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:580:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutexattr_init' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:582:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutexattr_settype' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:584:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutex_init' was not declared in this scope
/aux/obj/gcc41/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/libstdc++-v3/include/i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.15/bits/gthr-default.h:586:
error: '__gthrw_pthread_mutexattr_destroy' was not declared in this scope

It looks like this might be attributable to the update from 110280 to 111412 of
gcc/gthr-posix.h.


-- 
           Summary: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dogcow at babymeat dot com
 GCC build triplet: i386-unknown-netbsdelf
  GCC host triplet: i386-unknown-netbsdelf
GCC target triplet: i386-unknown-netbsdelf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-02-27 23:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  0:08 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-27 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
          Component|c++                         |libstdc++
           Keywords|                            |build
            Summary|compilation of c++ fails in |[4.1/4.2 Regression]
                   |eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD       |compilation of c++ fails in
                   |                            |eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-27 23:09 ` [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28  0:08 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-28  1:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-02-28  0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from dogcow at babymeat dot com  2006-02-27 23:55 -------
And, in fact, reverting gthr-posix.h to -r 110280 makes things build
successfully.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-27 23:09 ` [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  0:08 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-02-28  1:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  2006-02-28  1:27 ` [Bug other/26489] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2006-02-28  1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-02-28 01:10 -------
Roger, can you please help us a bit triaging this PR? First blush, I'm not
convinced it's a pure libstdc++ issue. Thanks a lot in advance.


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  1:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2006-02-28  1:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  1:34 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28  1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-28 01:18 -------
Can you add -g3 -save-temps to the end of the command line and attach the
preprocessed source?

The -g3 is to also get all the #define's.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  1:27 ` [Bug other/26489] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28  1:34 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-28  1:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-02-28  1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from dogcow at babymeat dot com  2006-02-28 01:29 -------
Created an attachment (id=10930)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10930&action=view)
-g3 -save-temps'ified eh_alloc.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  1:34 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-02-28  1:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  1:47 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-28 01:34 -------
I see the bug now:
#define pthread_once __libc_thr_once
#define pthread_self __libc_thr_self
#define pthread_exit __libc_thr_exit
#define pthread_setcancelstate __libc_thr_setcancelstate

So what is happening before, name was not being translated to __libc_thr_once
but only to pthread_once so in fact it looks like it was even wrong in rev
110280 but might not had noticed it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  1:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28  1:47 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-28  2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-02-28  1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from dogcow at babymeat dot com  2006-02-28 01:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=10931)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10931&action=view)
diff of eh_alloc with old and new gthr-posix.h

This should be pretty obvious, but it elucidates how the combination of the
change from __gthrw to __gthrw2 and the #define pthread_mutexBLAH interact.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  1:47 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-02-28  2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28  2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-28 01:48 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> So what is happening before, name was not being translated to __libc_thr_once
> but only to pthread_once so in fact it looks like it was even wrong in rev
> 110280 but might not had noticed it.
It was broken in 110280 as obvious by the diff as it was a weak link to
pthread_* which is wrong.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28  2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  2:11 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28  2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-28 02:00 -------
Just to show what I am talking about:
extern __typeof(__libc_thr_once) __gthrw_pthread_once __attribute__
((__weakref__("pthread_once")));

That is wrong as __gthrw_pthread_once should be a weak link to __libc_thr_once
and not pthread_once.
So it was wrong before Roger's patch, just Roger's patch exposed a build
failure instead.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28  2:11 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
  2006-02-28  3:23 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: roger at eyesopen dot com @ 2006-02-28  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from roger at eyesopen dot com  2006-02-28 02:07 -------
Created an attachment (id=10932)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10932&action=view)
patch

I think this untested patch might fix things.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  2:11 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
@ 2006-02-28  3:23 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-28  3:25 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-02-28  3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from dogcow at babymeat dot com  2006-02-28 03:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=10933)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10933&action=view)
patch as of -r 111507

With the (attached) patch modified to work with -r 111507, it now compiles,
links, etc after make clean. I'm not sure how to verify that it actually DTRT,
however. :)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  3:23 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-02-28  3:25 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
  2006-02-28  6:45 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: roger at eyesopen dot com @ 2006-02-28  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from roger at eyesopen dot com  2006-02-28 03:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=10934)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10934&action=view)
mainline patch v2

Here is a revised and slightly more tested version of the proposed patch for
mainline.  The 4.1 branch patch is identical except s/static/external/ in the
definition of __gthrw2.

2006-02-27  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>

        PR middle-end/26489
        * gthr-posix.h (__gthrw2): Define to take three parameters, the
        declared name, the weak reference name, and the typeof name.
        (__gthrw): Avoid expanding the declared name suffix.
        (__gthrw3): New Tru64 specific macro to simplify the OSF/1 decls.


-- 

roger at eyesopen dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #10932|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  3:25 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
@ 2006-02-28  6:45 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
  2006-02-28  7:42 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: roger at eyesopen dot com @ 2006-02-28  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from roger at eyesopen dot com  2006-02-28 03:30 -------
Hi moof, the way that you can test this patch is to run "make -k check" from
the top-level after bootstrapping the tree.  You'll notice that even before
my change (with RC1 for example), there'll be several thousand libstdc++ and
libgfortran failures.  With the newly proposed patch, you should now see
only a handful of failures for these testsuites.

I hope this helps.


-- 

roger at eyesopen dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  6:45 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
@ 2006-02-28  7:42 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-02-28 20:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-02-28  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from dogcow at babymeat dot com  2006-02-28 06:45 -------
results sent to gcc-testresults; here's the summary of the g++ section of the
tests.

FAIL: g++.dg/init/array15.C execution test
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            11965
# of unexpected failures        1
# of unexpected successes       2
# of expected failures          66
# of unsupported tests          86
/aux/obj/gcc41/gcc/testsuite/../g++  version 4.1.0 20060228 (prerelease)

Running target unix
FAIL: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c++.cc (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)

                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            2641
# of unexpected failures        2
# of expected failures          10
# of unsupported tests          147


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28  7:42 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-02-28 20:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-02  2:14 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.1.0                       |4.1.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-28 20:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-02  2:14 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
  2006-03-02  2:47 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dogcow at babymeat dot com @ 2006-03-02  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from dogcow at babymeat dot com  2006-03-02 02:14 -------
Created an attachment (id=10953)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10953&action=view)
4.1.0 branch version of patch.txt.


-- 

dogcow at babymeat dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #10933|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-02  2:14 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
@ 2006-03-02  2:47 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-02  3:27 ` [Bug other/26489] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-02  2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #15 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-02 02:47 -------
Subject: Bug 26489

Author: sayle
Date: Thu Mar  2 02:47:40 2006
New Revision: 111633

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111633
Log:

        PR other/26489
        * gthr-posix.h (__gthrw2): Define to take three parameters, the
        declared name, the weak reference name, and the typeof name.
        (__gthrw): Avoid expanding the declared name suffix.
        (__gthrw3): New Tru64 specific macro to simplify the OSF/1 decls.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/gthr-posix.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-02  2:47 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-02  3:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-14 19:21 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-14 23:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-02  3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-02 03:27 -------
Confirmed, fixed on the mainline and will most likely be committed to the 4.1
branch in a couple of days so it gets some testing on the mainline first.

By the way nice nick.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |4.1.0
      Known to work|                            |4.0.3 4.2.0
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-03-02 03:27:46
               date|                            |
            Summary|[4.1/4.2 Regression]        |[4.1 Regression] compilation
                   |compilation of c++ fails in |of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc
                   |eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD       |on NetBSD


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-02  3:27 ` [Bug other/26489] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-14 19:21 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-14 23:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-14 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #17 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-14 19:21 -------
Subject: Bug 26489

Author: sayle
Date: Tue Mar 14 19:21:25 2006
New Revision: 112064

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112064
Log:

        PR other/26489
        Backport from mainline.
        * gthr-posix.h (__gthrw2): Define to take three parameters, the
        declared name, the weak reference name, and the typeof name.
        (__gthrw): Avoid expanding the declared name suffix.
        (__gthrw3): New Tru64 specific macro to simplify the OSF/1 decls.


Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/gthr-posix.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26489] [4.1 Regression] compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD
  2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-14 19:21 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-14 23:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-14 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-14 23:08 -------
Fixed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26489


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-14 23:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-27 23:01 [Bug c++/26489] New: compilation of c++ fails in eh_alloc.cc on NetBSD dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-02-27 23:09 ` [Bug libstdc++/26489] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  0:08 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-02-28  1:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-02-28  1:27 ` [Bug other/26489] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  1:34 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-02-28  1:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  1:47 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-02-28  2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  2:11 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
2006-02-28  3:23 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-02-28  3:25 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
2006-02-28  6:45 ` roger at eyesopen dot com
2006-02-28  7:42 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-02-28 20:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-02  2:14 ` dogcow at babymeat dot com
2006-03-02  2:47 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-02  3:27 ` [Bug other/26489] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 19:21 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 23:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).