public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
       [not found] <bug-16030-4066@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-07  3:23 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-28  9:29 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-07  3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-07 03:23 -------
Not a high priority as per maintainer.  Postponed to 3.4.6 era


-- 

gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.5                       |3.4.6


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
       [not found] <bug-16030-4066@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-07  3:23 ` [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28  9:29 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #15 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-28 09:28 -------
Fixed in 4.0 and up.


-- 

gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|3.4.6                       |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-31  2:37 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
@ 2005-05-19 17:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-19 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.4                       |3.4.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-31  2:05 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-10-31  2:37 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2005-05-19 17:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net @ 2004-10-31  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2004-10-31 02:37 -------
No, I won't backport this patch.  Although the patch did apply cleanly and 
fixed this bug,  using change_decl_assembler name caused warnings with mingw 
(in my code base, not in testsuite) that are not seen on trunk.  I'm sorry that 
I didn't report this immediately.  I'll try to sort it out before 3.4.4 but I 
do not see this as a high priority problem.

Danny

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-31  2:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31  2:05 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2004-10-31  2:37 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2005-05-19 17:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-10-31  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-10-31 02:05 -------
Danny, can you please quickly retest the patch and apply it immediatly to the 
branch? We might be still in time for 3.4.3.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-08-29 18:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31  2:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-31  2:05 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31  2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-31 02:01 -------
Postponed until GCC 3.4.4.  

Although it's somewhat sad the patch has not yet been applied, given that I
approved it in August.  It's still OK to apply the patch, before 3.4.3, if
somebody wants to do that.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.3                       |3.4.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2004-08-21  8:05 ` [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2004-08-23  6:54 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2004-08-29 18:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-31  2:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-29 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-29 18:51 -------
Postponed until GCC 3.4.3.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.2                       |3.4.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2004-08-21  8:05 ` [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
@ 2004-08-23  6:54 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
  2004-08-29 18:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2004-08-23  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2004-08-23 06:54 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function
 decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net wrote:

>------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2004-08-21 08:05 -------
>Fixed on 3.5  The patch applies cleanly to 3.4.2.  OK there as well?
>Danny
>
>  
>
OK.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
  2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
@ 2004-08-21  8:05 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2004-08-23  6:54 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net @ 2004-08-21  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2004-08-21 08:05 -------
Fixed on 3.5  The patch applies cleanly to 3.4.2.  OK there as well?
Danny

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|3.4.1 3.5.0                 |3.4.1
      Known to work|                            |3.5.0
            Summary|[3.4/3.5 Regression]        |[3.4 Regression]
                   |[cygwin/mingw]: stdcall     |[cygwin/mingw]: stdcall
                   |function decoration vs      |function decoration vs
                   |LTHUNK alias in multiple    |LTHUNK alias in multiple
                   |inheritanc                  |inheritanc


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-28  9:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-16030-4066@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-07  3:23 ` [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  9:29 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-17  2:53 [Bug c++/16030] New: " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2004-08-21  8:05 ` [Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2004-08-23  6:54 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-08-29 18:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31  2:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31  2:05 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-31  2:37 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2005-05-19 17:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).