public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/26552]  New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options
@ 2006-03-03 20:38 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-03 23:40 ` [Bug target/26552] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-03 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin since PIC is enabled by default but on
darwin PIC is handled differently so it should be able to sibcall to the
indirect function.


-- 
           Summary: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default
                    options
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i686-darwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options
  2006-03-03 20:38 [Bug target/26552] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-03 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-03 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-03 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-03 23:40 -------
Here is the patch which should fix this bug:
Index: i386.c
===================================================================
--- i386.c      (revision 111688)
+++ i386.c      (working copy)
@@ -2232,7 +2232,9 @@ ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall (tree decl,
   /* If we are generating position-independent code, we cannot sibcall
      optimize any indirect call, or a direct call to a global function,
      as the PLT requires %ebx be live.  */
-  if (!TARGET_64BIT && flag_pic && (!decl || !targetm.binds_local_p (decl)))
+  if (!TARGET_MACHO
+      && !TARGET_64BIT
+      && flag_pic && (!decl || !targetm.binds_local_p (decl)))
     return false;

   if (decl)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options
  2006-03-03 20:38 [Bug target/26552] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-03 23:40 ` [Bug target/26552] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-03 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-01-24 12:08 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-03 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-03 23:51 -------
After talking with Eric Christopher, this patch is going to be wrong when he
removes the stubs for x86 as there will be a PLT now so I am not going to
submit the patch and I am removing the missed-optimization.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|missed-optimization         |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options
  2006-03-03 20:38 [Bug target/26552] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-03 23:40 ` [Bug target/26552] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-03 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-24 12:08 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-03-19 23:42 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
  2010-08-30 16:50 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-24 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-01-24 12:08:04
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options
  2006-03-03 20:38 [Bug target/26552] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-24 12:08 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-19 23:42 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
  2010-08-30 16:50 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2010-03-19 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2010-03-19 23:42 -------
Should this bug be closed? I don't every recall seeing it in recent history on
i686-apple-darwin*.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options
  2006-03-03 20:38 [Bug target/26552] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-03-19 23:42 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2010-08-30 16:50 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-30 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-30 16:49 -------
Let us know if there are any remaining issues, thanks.


-- 

mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-30 16:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-03 20:38 [Bug target/26552] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-03 23:40 ` [Bug target/26552] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-03 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-24 12:08 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-19 23:42 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2010-08-30 16:50 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).