From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20091 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2006 06:23:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 20065 invoked by uid 48); 6 Mar 2006 06:23:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 06:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060306062330.20064.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/19101] missing & in character continuation not caught In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00588.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 06:23 ------- I have found the fix for this. It is simple. Do we want to allow the missing & and then give an error on -pedantic? Intel allows the missing & and continues at the next non blank character. How strict shall we go? per standard it "shall have". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19101