public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
@ 2006-01-31 1:46 hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 2:04 ` [Bug fortran/26041] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-31 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465]$ cat foo.f90
module foo
public bar_
interface bar_
module procedure bar
end interface
public xxx_
interface xxx_
module procedure xxx
end interface
contains
subroutine xxx(self,z)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)), dimension(:) :: z
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)) :: res
end function
end interface
call bar_(self)
end subroutine
subroutine bar(self)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)) :: res
end function
end interface
end subroutine
end
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465]$ make
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/gfortran
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -O2 -S foo.f90
In file foo.f90:18
call bar_(self)
1
Error: Generic subroutine 'bar_' at (1) is not an intrinsic subroutine
make: *** [foo.s] Error 1
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465]$
Intel FORTRAN compiler has no problem. If I remove
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)), dimension(:) :: z
gfortran can compile it.
--
Summary: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-31 2:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 4:58 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-31 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 02:04 -------
This does not look like valid code.
As the types of the dummy z are different.
The error message is bogus but that is a different bug. PR 20067.
Arrays have nothing to do with it by the way, you can reproduce the error with:
module foo
public bar_
interface bar_
module procedure bar
end interface
public xxx_
interface xxx_
module procedure xxx
end interface
contains
subroutine xxx(self,z)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
integer :: z
real :: res
end function
end interface
call bar_(self)
end subroutine
subroutine bar(self)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real :: z
real :: res
end function
end interface
end subroutine
end
And it is obvious from there that bar_ cannot be called from xxx. (Intel's
fortran compiler accepts this too which I find weird as this is obvious broken
code).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 2:04 ` [Bug fortran/26041] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-31 4:58 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 23:34 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-31 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 04:58 -------
How about this?
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465b]$ !cat
cat foo.f90
module foo
public bar_
interface bar_
module procedure bar
end interface
public xxx_
interface xxx_
module procedure xxx
end interface
contains
subroutine bar(self, z)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real z
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)) :: res
end function
end interface
end subroutine
subroutine xxx(self,z)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real z
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)) :: res
end function
end interface
call bar_(self, z)
end subroutine
end
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465b]$ make
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/gfortran
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -O2 -S foo.f90
In file foo.f90:26
call bar_(self, z)
1
Error: Generic subroutine 'bar_' at (1) is not an intrinsic subroutine
make: *** [foo.s] Error 1
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465b]$
If I swap the order of xxx and bar, it compiles:
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465b]$ !cat
cat foo.f90
module foo
public bar_
interface bar_
module procedure bar
end interface
public xxx_
interface xxx_
module procedure xxx
end interface
contains
subroutine xxx(self,z)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real z
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)) :: res
end function
end interface
call bar_(self, z)
end subroutine
subroutine bar(self, z)
interface
function self(z) result(res)
real z
real(kind=kind(1.0d0)) :: res
end function
end interface
end subroutine
end
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465b]$ make
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/gfortran
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -O2 -S foo.f90
[hjl@gnu-16 cpu2006-465b]$
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 2:04 ` [Bug fortran/26041] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 4:58 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-01-31 23:34 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-01 11:29 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-01-31 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 23:34 -------
The problem is in gfc_resolve:
void
gfc_resolve (gfc_namespace * ns)
{
...
gfc_traverse_ns (ns, resolve_symbol);
...
for (n = ns->contained; n; n = n->sibling)
gfc_resolve (ns)
...
resolve_code (ns->code, ns);
...
}
Depending on the order of the code, resolve_code may be called before symbols
are resolved.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-31 23:34 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-02-01 11:29 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-01 14:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-01 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 11:29 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> How about this?
As far as I can see, this latter testcase is valid code. Confirmed.
An additional comment:
If I change the call to the generic subroutine bar_ in xxx to a call to the
specific subroutine bar, I get
In file hum.f90:26
call bar(self, z)
1
Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument 'self' at (1)
which is also wrong.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-02-01 11:29:18
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-01 11:29 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-01 14:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-01 16:49 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-01 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 14:46 -------
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg02261.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2006-
| |01/msg02261.html
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-01 14:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-01 16:49 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-02 1:18 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-02-01 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-01 16:49 -------
*** Bug 26064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sven dot buijssen at math
| |dot uni-dortmund dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-01 16:49 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-02-02 1:18 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-05 19:52 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-02-02 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-02 01:18 -------
An updated patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00102.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-02 1:18 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-02-05 19:52 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-05 19:53 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-05 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 19:52 -------
Subject: Bug 26041
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 5 19:52:35 2006
New Revision: 110618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110618
Log:
2006-02-05 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR fortran/26041
PR fortran/26064
* gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_1.f90: New file.
* gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_2.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_3.f90: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_2.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_3.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-05 19:52 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-05 19:53 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-06 23:25 ` [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-05 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 19:53 -------
Subject: Bug 26041
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 5 19:53:00 2006
New Revision: 110619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110619
Log:
2006-02-05 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR fortran/26041
PR fortran/26064
* resolve.c (resolve_types): New function.
(resolve_codes): Likewise.
(gfc_resolve): Use them.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-05 19:53 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-06 23:25 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-07 22:29 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-06 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 23:25 -------
HJ
Will you port this to 4.1 or should it be closed? My preference would be the
former....
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-06 23:25 ` [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-07 22:29 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-07 22:31 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-07 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 22:29 -------
Subject: Bug 26041
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Mar 7 22:29:32 2006
New Revision: 111821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111821
Log:
2006-03-07 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR fortran/26041
PR fortran/26064
Backport from mainline
* resolve.c (resolve_types): New function.
(resolve_codes): Likewise.
(gfc_resolve): Use them.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-07 22:29 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-07 22:31 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-07 22:32 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-03-07 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-07 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 22:31 -------
Subject: Bug 26041
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Mar 7 22:30:58 2006
New Revision: 111822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111822
Log:
2006-03-07 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR fortran/26041
PR fortran/26064
Backport from mainline
* gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_1.f90: New file.
* gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_2.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_3.f90: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_2.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/sibling_dummy_procedure_3.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-07 22:31 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-07 22:32 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-03-07 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2006-03-07 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-07 22:32 -------
Fixed.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-07 22:32 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2006-03-07 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-07 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26041
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-07 22:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-31 1:46 [Bug fortran/26041] New: FORTRAN compiler won't compile the valid code hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 2:04 ` [Bug fortran/26041] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-31 4:58 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-01-31 23:34 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-01 11:29 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-01 14:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-01 16:49 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-02 1:18 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-02-05 19:52 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-05 19:53 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-06 23:25 ` [Bug fortran/26041] [4.1]: " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-07 22:29 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-07 22:31 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-07 22:32 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-03-07 22:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).