public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
[not found] <bug-24132-6649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-03-08 15:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-19 5:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-08 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 15:13 -------
Any news on the testcase?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
[not found] <bug-24132-6649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-03-08 15:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-19 5:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-19 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 05:19 -------
The testcase has been waiting on for almost 6 months now so closing as invalid.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
2005-09-29 22:54 [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] New: " yuri at tsoft dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-29 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-29 23:16 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: yuri at tsoft dot com @ 2005-09-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From yuri at tsoft dot com 2005-09-29 23:16 -------
> Nope but we cannot do it without a testcase.
I will send you some fake code as testcase withing 1-2 days.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
2005-09-29 22:54 [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] New: " yuri at tsoft dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-29 23:05 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
@ 2005-09-29 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 23:16 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-29 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 23:06 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> > Maybe it is better to just speed up GCC instead :).
> hopefully not by reducing optimization :-)
Nope but we cannot do it without a testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
2005-09-29 22:54 [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] New: " yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 22:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 23:00 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
@ 2005-09-29 23:05 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 23:16 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: yuri at tsoft dot com @ 2005-09-29 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From yuri at tsoft dot com 2005-09-29 23:04 -------
> Maybe it is better to just speed up GCC instead :).
hopefully not by reducing optimization :-)
> the processor indicated is not really useful as it would jump a lot.
jumping indicator is better than no indicator because it at least gives some feel.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
2005-09-29 22:54 [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] New: " yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 22:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-29 23:00 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 23:05 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: yuri at tsoft dot com @ 2005-09-29 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From yuri at tsoft dot com 2005-09-29 23:00 -------
actually there are more potentially relavant options:
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -funswitch-loops -fno-guess-branch-probability
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options
2005-09-29 22:54 [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] New: " yuri at tsoft dot com
@ 2005-09-29 22:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 23:00 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-29 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 22:58 -------
Maybe it is better to just speed up GCC instead :).
the processor indicated is not really useful as it would jump a lot.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |compile-time-hog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-19 5:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-24132-6649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-03-08 15:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] gcc-4.0.1 never finishes with aggressive optimization options pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-19 5:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 22:54 [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] New: " yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 22:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24132] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 23:00 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 23:05 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
2005-09-29 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-29 23:16 ` yuri at tsoft dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).