public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-01-08 6:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-08 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 06:00 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Isn't this a dup of bug 19101?
No but it is related to it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-08 6:00 ` [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-09 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 06:59 -------
I will see if I can fix this. I fear some serious messing with all the
matching routines may be required if it can not be handled in scanner.c
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-30 18:58:12 |2006-03-09 06:59:44
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-08 6:00 ` [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-09-20 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-20 02:45 -------
Subject: Bug number PR19260
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00854.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 03:58 -------
Subject: Bug 19260
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Oct 3 03:58:20 2006
New Revision: 117384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117384
Log:
2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/19262
* gfortran.h (gfc_option_t): Add max_continue_fixed and max_continue_free.
* options.c (gfc_init_options): Initialize fixed form and free form
consecutive continuation line limits.
* scanner.c (gfc_scanner_init_1): Initialize continue_line
and continue_count. (gfc_next_char_literal): Count the number of
continuation lines in the current statement and warn if
limit is exceeded.
2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/19260
* scanner.c (gfc_next_char_literal): Add check for missing '&'
and warn if in_string, otherwise return ' '.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
trunk/gcc/fortran/options.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/scanner.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 04:10 -------
Subject: Bug 19260
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Oct 3 04:09:49 2006
New Revision: 117385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117385
Log:
2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/19260
* gfortran.dg/continuation.f90: Rename to continuation_1.f90.
* gfortran.dg/continuation_2.f90: New test.
PR fortran/19262
* gfortran.dg/continuation_3.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/continuation_4.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/continuation_5.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/continuation_6.f: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_1.f90
- copied unchanged from r117065,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_2.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_3.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_4.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_5.f
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_6.f
Removed:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 04:11 -------
Fixed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-10-05 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-05 17:34 -------
Subject: Bug number PR19260
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00255.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
2005-01-05 11:12 [Bug fortran/19260] New: " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-05 18:11 ` [Bug fortran/19260] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-08 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08 21:00 -------
Isn't this a dup of bug 19101?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation
2005-01-05 11:12 [Bug fortran/19260] New: " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
@ 2005-01-05 18:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-05 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 18:10 -------
Confirmed. See sec. 3.3.1.3.1.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-05 18:10:58
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-05 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-08 6:00 ` [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2005-01-05 11:12 [Bug fortran/19260] New: " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-05 18:11 ` [Bug fortran/19260] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).