public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dnovillo at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/26084] ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP code
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060309191046.14589.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26084-2736@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #10 from dnovillo at redhat dot com 2006-03-09 19:10 -------
Subject: Re: ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP code
On 03/09/06 14:03, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Then there are two issues, one for the reduced testcase which is PR 26076 and
> another issue. But please don't say I don't understand the issue when the fact
> is this testcase here actually reduces to the testcase in PR 26076.
>
The fact that you closed one as a duplicate of the other is a clear
indication that you have no idea what the issue is about. Reducing one
test case to another one means nothing. The very reduction removes
information that hides other bugs, or other aspects of the same bug.
If you are so keen on closing PRs, close 26076 as a duplicate of this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26084
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-02 23:46 [Bug c++/26084] New: [gomp-branch] ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP coce martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-02-02 23:48 ` [Bug c++/26084] " martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-02-04 11:32 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-02-06 9:40 ` [Bug c++/26084] [gomp-branch] ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP code reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-06 11:15 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-02-07 10:44 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-02-07 12:12 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 18:49 ` [Bug c++/26084] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 19:01 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 19:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 19:10 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com [this message]
2006-03-09 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 19:28 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2006-03-22 12:33 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-22 12:50 ` [Bug middle-end/26084] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-22 12:53 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-22 14:37 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-03-23 11:37 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060309191046.14589.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).