* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-30 22:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:23 -------
We now have --build-sysroot, which ameliorates this situation.
(I don't fully understand Alexandre's suggestion, in the message linked from
Comment #13.)
In any case, I've downgraded this to P5, as, although clearly desirable,
building such a cross-compiler will not be release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-30 22:23 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-10-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-30 22:33 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
problem for cross to Solaris 8
What's this "4.1blocker-" stuff about? This certainly isn't a 4.1
blocker, and that information is already computable from the other
fields, as I've described.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-30 22:23 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:36 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
> problem for cross to Solaris 8
> What's this "4.1blocker-" stuff about? This certainly isn't a 4.1
> blocker, and that information is already computable from the other
> fields, as I've described.
Flags are better as we can have a requestor and only one group of people able
to set the flag (you in this case). So if I requested this should be a
blocker, you can deny it without even being CC'd to the bug. It is a little
more automated than what fields do. This is why I asked about flags. Fields
to me should not be used in this way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-30 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2006-03-11 3:20 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-10-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-30 22:38 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
problem for cross to Solaris 8
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:36 -------
> (In reply to comment #15)
>
>>Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Minor compilation
>> problem for cross to Solaris 8
>>What's this "4.1blocker-" stuff about? This certainly isn't a 4.1
>>blocker, and that information is already computable from the other
>>fields, as I've described.
>
>
> Flags are better as we can have a requestor and only one group of people able
> to set the flag (you in this case). So if I requested this should be a
> blocker, you can deny it without even being CC'd to the bug. It is a little
> more automated than what fields do. This is why I asked about flags. Fields
> to me should not be used in this way.
I don't think I agree. Maybe I can be made to, but please drive this on
the GCC list, and get buy-in, rather than doing it unilaterally. These
fields are tools for the RM, and all you're doing at the moment is
confusing me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-30 22:39 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2006-03-11 3:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-20 15:36 ` [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 3:20 ` [Bug other/15082] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-20 15:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-20 15:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-20 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 15:26 -------
*** Bug 28097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |info at yourkit dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-20 15:36 ` [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-20 15:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-18 2:54 ` [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-20 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 15:46 -------
*** Bug 28098 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-20 15:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-18 2:54 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-21 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-18 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:54 -------
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-18 2:54 ` [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-21 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-18 20:16 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-21 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-21 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-18 20:16 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15082] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Minor compilation problem for cross to Solaris 8
[not found] <bug-15082-5925@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-18 20:16 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-18 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 20:15 -------
After three years of deafening silence, I'm sure closing this as WONTFIX will
perhaps ignite protests from anyone on the CC: list who still cares about this
one. Should that happen, I encourage the respected victim to get some motion
in the process to resolve this bug :-)
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread