From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-179970-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7247 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2006 21:07:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 7231 invoked by uid 48); 12 Mar 2006 21:07:33 -0000
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060312210733.7230.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-26658-12348@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug regression/26658] perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and 4.*
In-Reply-To: <bug-26658-12348@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg01329.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-12 21:07 -------
apart from visibility stuff, both preprocessed sources are equal and do not
contain inline memcpy/memset from glibc.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26658