From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25407 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2006 16:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 25371 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2006 16:52:44 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060313165244.25370.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26626] [4.2 Regression] ICE in in add_virtual_operand In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg01398.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 16:52 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE in in add_virtual_operand On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 16:17 +0000, mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > ------- Comment #10 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 16:17 ------- > it looks to me that this commit exposed/introduced the ICE: Yes, we already know that :) Thanks though. This is just another case of us catching more illegal code with this ICE (as we used to with the NMT ice). The only solution in these cases it to remove the assert and let it generate bad code, but I want to fix other issues first before removing the assert. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26626