public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed
@ 2005-11-26 17:56 jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-27 19:11 ` [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2005-11-26 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
using GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.0 20051126 (prerelease) with '-g -pedantic
-std=f95', I get a bad / no diagnostic for the following invalid code:
INTEGER :: I(10),J(11)
write(6,*) DOT_PRODUCT(I,J)
END
--
Summary: better diagnostic needed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2005-11-27 19:11 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-30 7:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-27 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-27 19:11 -------
Sigh. Change subject to some meaningful.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|better diagnostic needed |array size mismatch in
| |DOT_PRODUCT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-27 19:11 ` [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-30 7:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-04 22:12 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-30 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 07:00 -------
Confirmed, this is obviously should be rejected.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |accepts-invalid, diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-12-30 07:00:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-27 19:11 ` [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-30 7:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-04 22:12 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-14 22:21 ` [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-04 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 22:12 -------
Subject: Bug 25075
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 4 22:11:57 2006
New Revision: 110596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110596
Log:
2006-02-04 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/25075
check.c (identical_dimen_shape): New function.
(check_dot_product): Use identical_dimen_shape() to check sizes
for dot_product.
(gfc_check_matmul): Likewise.
(gfc_check_merge): Check conformance between tsource and fsource
and between tsource and mask.
(gfc_check_pack): Check conformance between array and mask.
2006-02-04 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/25075
intrinsic_argument_conformance_1.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_argument_conformance_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/check.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-04 22:12 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-14 22:21 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-04 22:21 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-14 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 22:21 -------
Fixed on trunk, waiting for 4.1 to reopen.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Known to fail| |4.1.0
Known to work| |4.2.0
Summary|array size mismatch in |[4.1 only] array size
|DOT_PRODUCT |mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-14 22:21 ` [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-04 22:21 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-05 18:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-04 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 22:21 -------
Subject: Bug 25075
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 4 22:21:52 2006
New Revision: 111718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111718
Log:
2006-03-04 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/25045
PR fortran/25075
backport from mainline
* check.c (dim_check): Perform all checks if dim is optional.
(gfc_check_minloc_maxloc): Use dim_check and dim_rank_check
to check dim argument.
(check_reduction): Likewise.
check.c (identical_dimen_shape): New function.
(check_dot_product): Use identical_dimen_shape() to check sizes
for dot_product.
(gfc_check_matmul): Likewise.
(gfc_check_merge): Check conformance between tsource and fsource
and between tsource and mask.
(gfc_check_pack): Check conformance between array and mask.
2006-03-04 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/25045
PR fortran/25075
backport from mainline
* optional_dim.f90: New test.
* intrinsic_argument_conformance_1.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_argument_conformance_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_dim.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/check.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-04 22:21 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-05 18:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-05 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 18:36 -------
Fixed on 4.1 as well.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-05 18:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-14 1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-14 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25075
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-14 1:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-26 17:56 [Bug fortran/25075] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-27 19:11 ` [Bug fortran/25075] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-30 7:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-04 22:12 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-14 22:21 ` [Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-04 22:21 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-05 18:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).